B
BrainBOK
Dashboard
PricingStudy GuideFAQ
DashboardITTO ExplorerQuizFlashcardsExamsStudy Guide
DashboardITTO ExplorerQuizFlashcardsExamsStudy Guide
Guide Index
  • Accuracy vs Precision
  • Ambiguity vs Uncertainty
  • Attribute Sampling vs Variable Sampling
  • Common Cause vs Special Cause Variations
  • Communication Channels
  • Complexity Models
  • Configuration Management System
  • Contract Types
  • Control Charts
  • Cost Budget and Reserves
  • Direct Costs vs Indirect Costs
  • Earned Schedule
  • Earned Value Management
  • Estimation in Project Management
  • Expected Monetary Value (EMV)
  • Explicit vs Tacit Knowledge
  • Fist of Five
  • Focus Groups vs Facilitated Workshops
  • Gold Plating
  • Impediments, Obstacles, and Blockers
  • Knowledge vs Information
  • Lean vs Six Sigma
  • MoSCoW Technique
  • Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
  • Non-Functional Requirements in Agile
  • OSCAR Coaching and Mentoring Model
  • Osmotic Communication
  • Personas
  • PMI-isms
  • Product Quality vs Project Quality
  • Product Scope vs Project Scope
  • Progressive Elaboration
  • Project Management Data and Information
  • Project Selection Methods
  • Quality vs Grade
  • Requirement Types
  • Resource Calendar vs Resource Histogram
  • Risk Management Terms
  • Risk Response Strategies
  • Risk vs Issue
  • Roles and Responsibilities
  • Rolling Wave Planning
  • Scope Creep
  • Scope Creep vs Gold Plating
  • Sensitivity Analysis and Tornado Diagram
  • Verification vs Validation
  • Project Management Business Documents
  • Crashing vs Fast Tracking
  • Critical Path Method (CPM)
  • Index
  • Situational Leadership (SLII)
  • Lessons Learned Management Techniques
  • Pondy's Conflict Model
  • Requirements vs Scope - What's the Difference?
  • Resource Leveling vs Resource Smoothing
  • Rule of Seven in Control Charts
  • Situational Questions
  • Stakeholder Classification Models
  • Study Notes Unpublished
  • The Triple Constraints
Study Notes

OSCAR Coaching and Mentoring Model

An overview of the OSCAR Coaching and Mentoring Model and its relevance in project management

Overview

The OSCAR coaching and mentoring model emphasizes the importance of collaboration and partnership between the coach or mentor and the mentee, and it encourages the mentee to take ownership of their goals and actions. The coach or mentor's role is to facilitate the mentee's exploration and decision-making process, and to provide guidance and support as needed. It was developed by Karen Whittleworth and Andrew Gilbert.

The OSCAR model can be used in project management to help project managers provide effective support and guidance to their team members. By using this model, project managers can help team members to develop their skills and abilities, overcome challenges, and achieve their goals. The model is particularly useful for project managers seeking to adopt a coaching style.

Five Elements of the OSCAR Model

Five Steps of the OSCAR Coaching and Mentoring Model

Credit: Icons created by Dewi Sari - Flaticon

OSCAR is an acronym for the five steps of the model viz. Outcome, where goals are defined; Situation, which involves understanding the current state; Choices, exploring available options; Actions, planning the steps to take; and Review, evaluating progress and making necessary adjustments.

  1. Outcome: The desired outcome or goal of the coaching or mentoring relationship should be clearly defined and agreed upon by both parties.
  2. Situation: The project manager should assess the situation and consider factors such as the team member's strengths, weaknesses, and challenges, as well as external factors that may be impacting their performance or wellbeing.
  3. Choices (and/or Consequences): The project manager should help the team member explore and evaluate different options and choices for achieving their desired outcome.
  4. Actions: The project manager should help the team member develop an action plan for implementing their chosen options and achieving their desired outcome.
  5. Review: The project manager should continually review and evaluate the team member's progress, providing feedback and making adjustments as needed to ensure they stay on track towards achieving their desired outcome.
PreviousNon-Functional Requirements in AgileNextOsmotic Communication

On This Page

OverviewFive Elements of the OSCAR Model