Crashing vs Fast Tracking

Difference between Crashing and Fast Tracking in Project Schedule Management

Overview

  • Both crashing and fast-tracking are schedule compression techniques.
  • Both techniques aim to compress the project schedule without compromising on the scope.

Crashing

Crashing is a schedule compression technique that involves determining an approach that brings maximum reduction in project duration with least incremental cost and risk, and without changing the scope.

Drawbacks of Crashing

  • Increased Risks
  • Increased Costs
  • May not always result in a compressed schedule

Fast Tracking

Fast tracking is a schedule compression technique that reduces the project duration by performing critical path activities in parallel that were originally planned to be performed in sequence.

Drawbacks of Fast Tracking

  • Increased Risks
  • Rework

Differences between Crashing and Fast Tracking

  • In crashing, schedule is compressed by applying additional resources, working overtime, etc. Whereas in fast tracking, activities which are usually performed in sequence are performed in parallel, to compress the schedule.
Last updated: September 10, 2018