B
BrainBOK
Dashboard
PricingStudy GuideFAQ
Sign InGet Started
DashboardITTO ExplorerQuizFlashcardsExamsStudy Guide
DashboardITTO ExplorerQuizFlashcardsExamsStudy Guide
Study Notes

Stakeholder Classification Models — Power/Interest Grid & More

Guide to stakeholder classification models including the Power/Interest Grid, Salience Model, and Stakeholder Cube. Used in the Identify Stakeholders process for the PMP exam.

You're viewing a free preview of the Study Guide. Upgrade to access all 500+ pages.

Or view all plans

Stakeholder Analysis

Stakeholder analysis is a technique used to identify the stakeholders, and their interest, experience and influence on the project.

Why is Stakeholder Classification important

Large projects may have hundreds or even thousands of stakeholders. Projects have limited time, and resources. Therefore, the amount of effort spent on stakeholder management and engagement needs to be prioritized. But what criteria do we use to classify the stakeholders? How do project managers determine which stakeholders have the biggest impact or influence on the project and deserve the most attention? How do project managers prioritize their attention to competing stakeholders?

These are exactly the problems that the stakeholder classification models address. It is important to prioritize the stakeholders to ensure efficient use of effort to communicate and manage their expectations.

  1. Prioritization:
  • Focus resources on stakeholders who need more attention.
  • Ensure critical stakeholders are managed closely.
  1. Tailored Communication:
  • Develop effective communication strategies for different stakeholder groups.
  • Ensure the right information reaches the right stakeholders at the right time.
  1. Risk Management:
  • Identify stakeholders who may pose risks.
  • Proactively mitigate potential risks.
  1. Stakeholder Engagement:
  • Create appropriate engagement strategies.
  • Foster and maintain stakeholder support.
  1. Expectation Management:
  • Align stakeholder expectations with project goals.
  • Enhance stakeholder satisfaction by addressing their concerns.

Stakeholder Classification Models

Several models are available to classify stakeholders according to the their power, interest, impact, influence, urgency and other parameters.

Grid-based Models

The grid-based models are useful for small projects or projects with simple stakeholder relationships. The three common grid-based models are:

  • Power/Interest grid
  • Power/Influence grid
  • Impact/Influence grid
Stakeholder Power-Interest Grid

Classifying stakeholders helps prioritize engagement efforts. Here's a general guideline:

  • High Power, High Interest: Manage closely, collaborate, and involve in decision-making.
  • High Power, Low Interest: Keep satisfied, inform proactively, and address concerns.
  • Low Power, High Interest: Educate, listen to feedback, and address anxieties.
  • Low Power, Low Interest: Monitor, provide basic updates, and communicate minimally.

Salience Model

The Salience Model classifies stakeholders based on the following three attributes:

  • Power: authority and influence in the organization and on the project outcomes
  • Legitimacy: their involvement is appropriate (morally, legally etc.)
  • Urgency: calls for immediate attention, or pressing need

The Salience Model is graphically depicted as a Venn Diagram as shown below. The three circles represent Power, Legitimacy and Urgency. It has eight regions marked on the diagram each representing different types of stakeholders on the project. Different strategies are used to manage each of the eight categories of stakeholders identified using this model.

Salience Model helps to identify "Who or What Really Counts". The model emphasizes the need to pay attention to stakeholders in a timely manner. The Salience Model has advantages over the two-dimensional grid models such as the Power-Interest Grid, as the Salience Model adds the vital dimensions of legitimacy and urgency. It provides the project managers a systematic approach to managing stakeholder relationships.

Stakeholder Classification - Salience Model

Refer to Deep Fried Brain Project's blog post The Salience Model for Stakeholder Classification for an in-depth explanation of the Salience Model.

Stakeholder Cube

The three dimensions of a stakeholder cube are:

  • Power
  • Interest
  • Attitude

Mosaic Project's post For Stakeholders, 2×2 Is Not Enough! provides a very good explanation of the Stakeholder Cube.

Directions of Influence

Stakeholders can be classified based on their influence on the project or the project team. This method of classification includes:

  • Upward: Senior management, sponsor, steering committee
  • Downward: Project team members and experts working on the project
  • Outward: Suppliers, government agencies, regulators, public and end users
  • Sideward: Peers such as other project managers, and functional managers

Prioritization

Prioritizing stakeholders may be necessary when:

  • Large number of stakeholders are involved
  • Stakeholders are changing rapidly
  • Relationship with stakeholders is complex

Enjoying this article?

BrainBOK members get everything they need to pass the PMP or CAPM — all in one place.

  • 500+ Study Guide pages across all PMP & CAPM domains
  • 2,000+ practice exam questions with full explanations
  • ITTO Explorer — visual maps for all processes & knowledge areas
  • Adaptive flashcards for fast terminology recall
Create Free AccountSee Plans & Pricing
PreviousSituational QuestionsNextStudy Notes Unpublished

0 / 60 completed

0%

Guide Index
  • Accuracy vs Precision
  • Ambiguity vs Uncertainty
  • Attribute Sampling vs Variable Sampling
  • Common Cause vs Special Cause Variations
  • Communication Channels
  • Complexity Models
  • Configuration Management System
  • Contract Types
  • Control Charts
  • Cost Budget and Reserves
  • Direct Costs vs Indirect Costs
  • Earned Schedule
  • Earned Value Management
  • Estimation in Project Management
  • Expected Monetary Value (EMV)
  • Explicit vs Tacit Knowledge
  • Fist of Five
  • Focus Groups vs Facilitated Workshops
  • Gold Plating
  • Impediments, Obstacles, and Blockers
  • Knowledge vs Information
  • Lean vs Six Sigma
  • MoSCoW Technique
  • Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
  • Non-Functional Requirements in Agile
  • OSCAR Coaching and Mentoring Model
  • Osmotic Communication
  • Personas
  • PMI-isms
  • Product Quality vs Project Quality
  • Product Scope vs Project Scope
  • Progressive Elaboration
  • Project Management Data and Information
  • Project Selection Methods
  • Quality vs Grade
  • Requirement Types
  • Resource Calendar vs Resource Histogram
  • Risk Management Terms
  • Risk Response Strategies
  • Risk vs Issue
  • Roles and Responsibilities
  • Rolling Wave Planning
  • Scope Creep
  • Scope Creep vs Gold Plating
  • Sensitivity Analysis and Tornado Diagram
  • Verification vs Validation
  • Project Management Business Documents
  • Crashing vs Fast Tracking
  • Critical Path Method (CPM)
  • Index
  • Situational Leadership (SLII)
  • Lessons Learned Management Techniques
  • Pondy's Conflict Model
  • Requirements vs Scope - What's the Difference?
  • Resource Leveling vs Resource Smoothing
  • Rule of Seven in Control Charts
  • Situational Questions
  • Stakeholder Classification Models
  • Study Notes Unpublished
  • The Triple Constraints